Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Sometimes, as we muddle our way through this crazy place, we meet some folks who truly understand us.

Today, I lost a very special friend.. I never met them in person, but, that is the beauty of the internet. You can touch the lives of others and they yours, without ever walking through their front door and shaking their hand.

Lately, I've been engrossed in my own little set of tribulations..  health has been poor, and a relative unhappiness has settled in. I've been distant, and rarely said hello to one of my best friends.  Now they are gone, and I am left with a hole rapidly filling with regret.

Please, if you find yourself in the same situation, do something about it before you find yourself begging the aether for forgiveness.

Take care my friend.. you will always be with me. <3
Here is a great base layer to start with. Absolute Madness (zjulia function viewer) Have Fun!

Fractal4 {
  title="Fractal4" width=640 height=480 layers=1
  caption="Layer 3" opacity=100 method=multipass
  center=-0.8093494211/1.3646701732 magn=4.2631147 angle=85.956
  maxiter=250 filename="ben.ufm" entry="FviewJ" f_fn1=exp f_fn2=abs
  p_power=0.4784983/-0.9964164 p_c=0.46013/-1.03812 p_bailout=300
  smooth=yes index=0 color=16121855 index=62 color=7977155 index=255
  color=0 index=266 color=0
  smooth=no index=0 opacity=255

What can you do with it? I'd love to see!
Hey folks!

I recently started a twitter account at

When I am not glued to a fractal, I can often be found beta testing new games. This account is where I share my findings. If you like news about free to play games, mmo's, rpg's, and other geek related fun, stop on by.

Hope to you there!
Fractals have always held a certain fascination for me. For a long time, it has been a hobby that remained in relative obscurity. Often one would lose the message, explaining the technical details. Not unlike a painter, in a world that had never seen paint. These past few years however, I have seen an immense explosion in the use of fractals, and especially the use of their particular concepts to convey emotions.

Today, I found another such example of incredibly fine, fractal use in media. has some amazing web site art, and I thought perhaps you would like to see it as well. I have seen more and more of this type of art, hopping off the underground posters and onto cd covers, websites, and into movies.

Truly, it is an exciting time to be creating fractals.
If you have a moment to explore the subject, I suggest hopping on over to to learn more.

I think you might enjoy it.

This weeks Inspiration Station features the Faber brothers, Joel and Michael. I doubt they need much introduction, so I will let their work speak for me.

Hands down, MichaelFaber produces some of the best flames on the net.

On Par by MichaelFaber Dragon Tears by MichaelFaber Portrait of Invasion by MichaelFaber Separation by MichaelFaber Reach Out by MichaelFaber

And my personal favorite from his gallery:
The Time Machine by MichaelFaber

JoelFaber too, seems to have a flair for the mathematic.  Not to be outdone, his gallery is also full of gems.
Revelation by JoelFaber Mystified by JoelFaber Undone by JoelFaber Pacific by JoelFaber Descent by JoelFaber

And my personal favorite from his gallery:
Portal by JoelFaber

Outside of their fantastic artwork, both have worked hard to bring new variations to the apophysis community. So pay their galleries a vist, you won't be disappointed.

Cheers for now!
This weeks inspirational fractalist is Chiara, aka lindelokse

You can often find her flitting from fractal to fractal, cheering up the galleries with her bright attitude. When she sits down in front of apophysis, magic happens. Her flame fractals are polished, and beautiful. I hope you will enjoy them as much as I have.

Lotus by lindelokse Inception by lindelokse Aquamarines by lindelokse Narya by lindelokse Life by lindelokse the Loonie Cave by lindelokse Precious by lindelokse Musk and Pollen by lindelokse Eternal by lindelokse

I learned how to make my apo flowers from her excellent tutorial found here: and it looks like Chiara may have a 3d version in the works. :dance:

I hope you enjoy her work as well.
This weeks inspiration is :iconaexion:

Aexion is best known for his unique 3d fractals, and for creating the 3d fractal software known as Incendia, which can be found at

Below are some of my favorite images from his gallery. I hope you enjoy them as much as I do.

Stairway to.. by Aexion The Fractal Temple of New Age by Aexion The Sunset Castle by Aexion Julia Variation I by Aexion   Golden City by Aexion   Athena by Aexion Dreaming Again by Aexion Dichotomy by Aexion Summer by Aexion

I especially enjoy his fractal architecture, and his gallery has some stunning examples of it.

All the best,
Today's Inspiration is :icons31415:

I wanted to first, start with saying thanks to Sam. I use his coloring algorithm SFBM II in a wide variety of my pieces for a number of purposes, and simply put, my work would not be the same without it. Likewise, many of the coloring algorithms and formulae he took the time to write for Ultra Fractal have proven indispensable. Many fractals today would simply not be the same without his interest in the craft.

Samuel Monnier is best known for his style of pattern piling, utilizing like patterns, at iteratively smaller scales. I am personally quite fond of the style itself, and find it quite engaging.  Sam takes these works a step further, and offers them on his website in a huge, explorable form.

Below are some of my favorites:
20100829-1 by s31415 20080803 by s31415 20090715-1 by s31415 20090829-1 by s31415 20091107-1 by s31415 20100910-1 by s31415 20090504 by s31415 20090521 by s31415 20090219 by s31415

To me, his work often shows a great understanding of white-space, color balance, and light diffusion, offering up a happy marriage between the high's and lows of the color spectrum. Be sure to stop by his webpage to view them in even greater detail.

Heya folks!

A new fractal generator has hit the web and you may be interested in giving it a try. Check out Ross Hilbert's Fractal Science Kit at :

Written by Ross Hilbert :iconrosshilbert:

So far it looks like a good mix of fractal bases to work with. I will give a more in depth review once I have had a chance to play with it.

Enjoy and Happy Fractaling!
The time is again upon us. The Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest 2011 , is open for entry.

If you are interested in entering the contest, or interested in learning more, please visit:…

Normally, I would be quite enthusiastic, but there have been a number of issues raised regarding the contest that I feel need to be addressed. Specifically, the smear campaign started, and perpetuated by a little blog called Orbit Trap.

Normally, I don't place too much weight on what a few uninformed individuals have to say, but in light of recent events, I feel it would be less than proper not to offer my own perspective. As many of you know, Benoit Mandelbrot recently passed away, in mid October of last year. He was the Honorary Chairman of this contest.  Many blanket statements made by Orbit Trap include Benoit in their scope, and I don't feel it pays proper homage to the man who literally spent his life on that which they claim to be defending. They have openly insulted him, others in his field, and anyone involved in the contest. What is worse, is it seems to be a perfectly good price to pay for a few hits to their blog. They ride the BMFAC keyword like a tardy messenger, on a fresh horse.

The BMFAC has not, as of yet, listed it's operational model, nor it's judges, and yet, Orbit Trap is already out in force. Closing with remarks that suggest that, simply to enter, would require you to put your ethics aside, or "Have no moral scruples whatsoever."

There have been a number of issues raised regarding the contest rules, that I feel are completely baseless. Rather than simply say they are wrong, I will try to explain why I think there might be more to this picture than meets the eye.

1) Image size requirements.
Orbit Trap constantly tries to tell it's readers that the contest is 'rigged'. One method they use to do so, is alluding that the image size requirements are far too high for the 'average' fractalist to achieve, and thus,  are purposefully designed to dissuade entries. They go even further beyond this, to suggest that the image size requirements can only be met by specific software programs, and use this as a way to call into question the moral standpoint of the judges and organizers.

The technical standpoint is far too easy to prove, so let's look at it from the moral standpoint. Anyone on Deviant Art knows that high quality prints require high quality images. We are not living in the 80's anymore. Following this link: and (scrolling down to the 24x36 inch print line) will show that an image 2 feet, by 3 feet, will require 7200x10800 pixels for excellent quality, and 3600x5400 for minimum (poor) quality. The contest asks for 8000 pixels on the longest side to produce prints of the same size. What do these numbers show?  Well, if you subtract the minimum size requirements, from the maximum, you get a requirement difference of 5400 pixels. Half of this is range, is 2700 pixels. If you add that to the minimum quality requirements, you reach the midpoint of 8100 pixels.  It can only conclude that the organizers have opted for the mid-range, even though they probably could have pushed for better.

2) Ultra-Fractal Bias
Orbit trap also attempts to discredit the contest organizers by alluding to a bias towards Ultra-Fractal. They have, on a number of occasions, accused contest organizers of choosing pieces simply because they are made in Ultra-Fractal. Because the creator of the software was asked to serve as a judge for the contest, they often call into question Frederik Slijkerman ability to place a vote ethically. The slight of hand going on is fairly obvious if you know how the contest is set up. Frederik is but one judge... of many. The competition is weighted, and it would be fairly hard for Frederik to get away with doing something like that, even if he was the marketing monster Orbit Trap claims him to be. They further postulate that because many of the judges are ultra-fractal users themselves, that they do not have the ability to choose a piece that isn't made in their software of choice.

This is a logical fallacy in the extreme. It is no different than saying an artist who uses oil paint lacks the ability to judge a mixed media art contest. It's no different than saying a Photoshop user shouldn't ethically be allowed to judge a contest that allows gimp, or paintshop to be used.

Want in on a little secret? Chaos Pro Understands up to Ultrafractal 3.02 and can replicate most of it's features, including understanding it's formula database. From a technical side, there are many fractals that could have been made in Chaospro that mimic precisely the look and feel of an Ultra Fractal setup. (It's also available free at: )

Want in on another? Images like Polychromic: are rendered a layer at a time, and assembled in Photoshop. I discovered something amazing really. Seems Photoshop allows you to work in layers! Seems the inability for other fractal programs to work in layers doesn't carry much weight now that Photoshop has been invented.

But why leave it there? Another 'secret' to fractal art is that your renders are mathematically precise. This means that if you are intelligent enough to operate a calculator, you can divide your render into chunks. This means, I could render a piece at 80,000 pixels wide if I really wanted too. No matter what the render limits on your fractal software, if you understand simple things like render bounds, you can alter your workflow easily to accommodate billboard size images and beyond.

3) Marketing Failure
Orbit trap also faults BMFAC for marketing their images in the real physical world, rather than online. Stating with unequivocal certainty that marketing online is the only way to operate, and that physical world endeavors are a paltry waste of time. Yes. They said that. About Art. I really wish I were kidding. Seems if you are interested in making art, it is a waste of time to commit it to paper. Looks a lot like they are already whipping that aforementioned horse.

4) Cliques and How Unwelcome You are
The writers over at Orbit Trap are a very peculiar, very paranoid pair. You wouldn't be able to win a spitting contest without them accusing you of cheating. One of the ways they accuse people of cheating is by grouping them together into imaginary cliques. If you win the Benoit, you are obviously part of the group, and your work holds no merit. This is another assumption that fuels much of their hate laced articles. They don't realize that their blanket statements alienate people, leading them to the very feelings they are experiencing.

I have personally entered twice, and both times I was lucky enough to have an entry chosen. I never exchanged emails with any of the judges or organizers before the event, and was only in contact with Javier Barrallo when dealing with the contest particulars. I worked very hard to make my entries and it certainly was not a cursory endeavor. I made almost fifty pieces last time the contest was run, before I finally chose the two I would enter. If I had known all I had to do was buddy up, I could have saved myself some time. At least the insults would be warranted and would probably sting a bit less.

Fact is, even I have been accused of being part of this imaginary clique, from people who know nothing about me, or who my friends are. I wish I were unique in this regard.

5) The Organizers are Self Serving
Orbit trap would have us believe that the contest organizers and judges are no more than self serving ,attention mongers; whose only interest is in the sale of their own prints and software. Often making statements like "Because, like self-publishing, self-produced art exhibitions of yourself and your friends tend to be less respected and even frowned upon in most professional circles." I doubt very much they are anywhere near a professional circle, nor have ever been. This type of exhibition is commonplace, and I personally believe that Orbit trap is a bit disconnected on the matter.

I can tell you from experience that I was never approached by a contest organizer regarding print sales as part of this competition. It would be very difficult indeed to place some pieces up for sale, while making others unavailable. That being said, I would imagine that if there were any sort of leverage being used to sell prints, the winners would be asked where print inquiries could be directed, and as a general rule, some sort of commission agreement would be in place. I was asked if the BMFAC could display my images, not if they could sell them.  

6) That anyone who defends the BMFAC is working in concert with the BMFAC and being rewarded for it.
Make no mistake, anyone who attempts to discuss these matters with Orbit Trap is a "propagandist".

There is a rule in life. Beware the accuser. Some people hide behind accusations to deflect negative personal attention, and the most effective tact  is to accuse others of that which you yourself are guilty. This is, I believe, the case with Orbit Trap, who are quite good at propaganda themselves. It is a pretty harsh judgement to make, I agree, but it isn't without merit. If you visit their blog, you will notice they have worked very hard on the format. Keywords are everywhere. It's one of the main themes of the blog. Rather than mention the BMFAC when it is relevant, they work very hard to mention it time and time again, at least twice a month. Experienced bloggers will recognize this technique immediately.

7) Mathematicians do not have the ability to Judge art.
One of Orbit Traps favorite arguments is that Mathematicians don't have the ability to judge art. That "Mathematicians are boneheads when it comes to art.  That's why they aren't in an arsty profession, they're mathematicians –academics and theorists."

If you are an artist, don't do any math. Better, don't read anything math or physics or science related for the rest of your life, because it may have the life altering effect of removing your ability to appreciate beauty. This is a common argument made by people who don't understand math or physics. Learning something about the inner workings or mechanisms of an object or process can only lend it more beauty.

The list literally goes on and on.. and on.. and on...


So, why take the time to write all this? Well, not so much that I really care about what OT has to say about me. I am here, and able to defend myself against their stupidity. Benoit however, is not. What I care most about, is that when you go to a search engine, and type in BMFAC, you get article after article, literally upwards of two a month or more, attempting to smear the competition. It has gone from a cursory heads up, to an all out campaign, and I simply can't sit idly by while they spread lies so soon after Benoit's death. I personally view it as the lowest form of attack and I believe Benoit deserves better.

Even before the competition existed, the Orbit Trap bloggers were attacking Damien Jones, and it has only escalated since it was first publicized. It seems that the Orbit Trap bloggers have a personal dispute with the contests creator, and have used the guise of being gallant to continue it. In doing so, they have unwittingly offended multitudes of people, and cast doubt on one of the last projects Benoit was associated with.

I will close with the following Orbit Trap quote,
"Benoit Mandelbrot might have had a (passing) interest in the artistic application of fractal geometry, but that was years ago when fractals were fresh and revolutionary."

Followed by the preface from the last BMFAC written by Benoit Mandelbrot.
[  As a young man during a dreadful period of history, I found safe refuge in very ambitious plans and hopes. I wished to devote my life to the picture deprived fields of mathematics or science. But I also wished to keep aside enough time for something different - namely, enjoyment of plastic art and music. Not as a creator, but as an active amateur. Now that I am an old man, it is wonderful to observe, not only that those plans have been fulfilled well enough, but have been fulfilled with an unanticipated and wonderful wrinkle. Fractal geometry - my life's work - has managed to combine very difficult mathematics, very useful science... and also a dash of a new flavor of art. A menage a trois has arisen between elegant thoughts, directly applicable thoughts, and plain pleasure of the eye. Could it really be that such an intimate coexistence has not been seen since the early Renaissance?

How did all that begin? Very modestly, when my first "solo" book of 1975 introduced the word "fractal" and outlined a new geometry. A great privilege had been granted to me, since I was the first to recognize a feature that had been - since time immemorial - common to many bits of knowledge, but had remained scattered all over and kept being forgotten and being rediscovered. What I recognized was that those nameless bits of knowledge were - in fact - as closely related as peas from one pod. Together, they provided a foundation on which I, and soon many others, could start building a brand new and extraordinarily belated theory for broad and practical properties of roughness.

In addition - miracle! - even that was not all. Not all by any means. In order to explain the wide acceptance of the word "fractal" and of my scientific ideas, one may recall the ancient theme of The Beauty and the Beast. When scientists perceive most of science as beautiful, they use this last term metaphorically. To the contrary, first I, then colleagues at work, and soon later many witnesses, felt early on that my scientific work brought out pictures that are beautiful in both usual and unusual meanings of that word.

How come? This question can not be discussed here in any detail. But let me make a wild guess about the world as perceived by humans. Flat planes and cubic buildings had easily been integrated into the familiar elementary geometry. But mountains, trees, and old buildings had not. More generally, real objects are so complicated that standard geometry fits them very rarely. The very belated next step beyond Euclid is represented by fractals.

Thirty five years after my book of 1975, my early pictures have become antiques. Fractals have grown like topsy and the web brings us an ever fresh flow of increasingly sophisticated and independent art.

To the aesthetic side of my implemented dreams, the organizers of the Fractal Art Contest - Javier Barrallo, Damien Jones, and the Selection Panel Members - have added an exhilarating contribution. We are fortunate that the burden enjoyed of selecting of some of today's best should reside in their good eye. The third exhibit of fractal art is coming close, and it has been a delight to provide a brief preface to the present striking catalog.  ]
   --Benoit Mandelbrot

Signing off,
An enjoyable video for those who have not seen it yet.…

If you are interested in playing with some fractals, directly in your browser... visit the fractal lab.

It's quite a toy, allowing you to explore some of the newer 3d fractals in real time. Snazzy, and quite addicting. Don't say I didn't warn you.

And if you're really technical, you can pop the hood and tweak/create the formula yourself.

Good luck, and happy fractaling!
It's that time of year again. Earth hour starts tomorrow, March 26th, at 8:30pm, your local time.

There is really no better time to kill the lights, shut down all the appliances, and go for a walk or visit a friend. I personally like going out for a walk and seeing how eerily silent everything is. I was pleasantly surprised last year at the number of people who took part. Entire blocks were blacked out.

For more information, visit

I am sure, by now, you are aware of the tragedy unfolding in Japan. I will spare you further iteration and simply ask you click the link below.

I found it to be a more personal way of sending aid, and thought you may as well.

If you are Canadian, like me, you enjoy unlimited access to the internet. Listen to music, watch the occasional video. Like me, you probably play some sort of online, multi-player game, or engage in similar multi-person activites, such as skyping with loved ones, or playing games on yahoo.

It's a small thing, but it's one of the things I've come to enjoy in my life, and it's being threatened. If Bell Canada has its way, internet will soon be paid "by the byte" and internet usage will all but plummet.

Do you want to consider if a link is worth clicking? Do you have enough money to read that next page? Is that kind of thought process something you want invading your online activities? How will you know the volume of data that will be served to you? Will you now have to pay for ad's streamed every 5 seconds while you read a pages content? Would you stop creating videos for others if the cost of doing so quintupled?

If you are concerned, and you should be, please visit for more information, and to sign the petition.

You do have the right to choose. But no one will come to your door to ask your opinion.. you gotta go knocking on theirs and give it.

Click the link, save the Canadian Internet.

  • Listening to: My modem whirring
Hey folks!

Ultra Fractal Express is going on sale, for $19.00 US on bitsdujour this friday. If you ever wanted to get into UF but the price tag was out of budget, this may be of interest.

Check this friday, November 5th. The sale is for one day only.

Hope all is well,
Happy Fractaling,
  • Listening to: Ace Ventura
Welcome to my gallery. Feel free to note me if something catches your eye, or if you have any questions about my work.

I have noticed a general trend towards the pairing of fractal imagery with modern music CD's. I am making my preexisting images available to those that wish to use them on their commercial CD's, royalty free. If you are in need of some wild imagery, but are having trouble cooking something up, look no further. I am a big fan of progressive trance, techno and goa, and I would love to see my works being used for this purpose.

I am also taking commissions. The majority of my work can be printed at any size, and adapted for many purposes. If you think fractal imagery would fit into your next project, please let me know. I am more interested in sharing fractal art than profiting off of it, so if you are on a tight budget, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Contact me at for more information before use. I like to support the projects I am involved with!

  • Listening to: Shpongle

Obama wins the Nobel Peace prize...

Journal Entry: Fri Oct 9, 2009, 8:58 AM

Welcome to my gallery. Feel free to note me if something catches your eye, or if you have any questions about my work.

SethraLavode, my partner in crime, has joined me on this crazy journey into fractal land. Visit her page if you crave even more fractal art.

I normally keep my gripes to myself.. but this is ludicrous. Barack Obama winning the nobel peace prize is the final nail in the coffin for me.

Nothing is sacred anymore. Blargaldeflarg! *lol*

K, I'm done.


P.S. If you haven't submitted your Benoit submission, today is the last day to do so. Hayaku!


  • Listening to: Beat Bizarre
  • Reading: Serial Numbers and Error Codes.
  • Watching: A Motherboard getting ready to beg for its life.
  • Playing: Which chip to pry out first.
  • Eating: Thermal Paste
  • Drinking: Caaahhhfeee.